Problem - Reaction - Solution: an age-old con re-examined

1. The ruling power, in its own interests, contrives a phony event to provoke public outrage against some innocent third party or thing.

2. The public, duly outraged, demands 'something' be done.

3. The ruling power, in response, provides a 'solution' to the problem it had itself

originally created.

Let's expand a bit. I know others have examined this concept before (most recently of note, David Icke, although he was not the first but all credit to you nonetheless, Mr. Icke). In any event, it is very worthy of further examination in the light of the times we currently live in.

We are witnessing the unfolding of an extraordinary age where our fundamental freedoms and rights are under serious and sustained attack by those who purport to rule us by our consent. The country where this disturbing state of affairs is most obviously the case, and has been for a generation now, is the UK. Rights and freedoms have been removed at a rate not seen there for nearly 800 years, and on the flimsy pretext of preventing possible 'terrorist attacks.' But the trend is far from confined to one country and we have seen similar attacks on our rights here in the US and further afield as well.

The problem-reaction-solution hypothesis requires a trigger event. In the US, the most prominent for many decades was the 9/11 attacks in New York (which of course we now know were carried out by Israel with George Bush's blessing). There have been other, less high-profile attempts since then, with various individuals trying to blow up aircraft with bombs concealed in their clothing (most notably the "underpants bomber" who was kindly escorted on board a US flight by none other than the US intelligence services, incredibly).

This is the way the classical model for this scam has worked in the past. Some kind of outrage takes place; the people demand action; the government complies, but the measures have "unintended negative consequences" for our personal freedoms (unintended, yeah, right). But recently, the steps involved have become a little flaky. Whilst we have seen no end to the pressure to curtail our rights and attack our freedoms (Stage 3 of the process) there has been a distinct lack of drive for such measures to come about from stages 1 and 2.

It is as if our governments were giving up on trying to fool us that it is all about 'protecting us' from some external threat. After all, since the truth about 9/11 broke free of the MSM pen, there have scarcely been massed columns of outraged citizens marching down Pennsylvania Avenue demanding more of their liberties be sacrificed, have there? Each new phony, government-orchestrated "terror" alarm is met by increasing levels of scepticism if not outright disbelief by an increasingly better-informed public.

More and more, in the age of the Internet and the ubiquitous presence of 'citizen journalists' with their vast numbers of cell phones and camcorders, Stage 1 operations appear to have been abandoned as now too risky for governments and their lackeys to carry out. Stage 2 (public outrage) which was increasingly failing to materialize anyway due to public suspicion, consequently arises no longer at all.

But hey-ho! There's nevertheless the Stage 3 'solution' to these non-existent threats: take the citizens' ancient, hard-fought rights away regardless, on the basis that there's some vague and unspecified but nonetheless serious existential threat to public safety that we cannot be told about in detail owing to, ahem, 'security considerations.'

We really must be NUTS to suffer this despicable situation to continue. As Huxley warned us more than five decades ago, the only REAL threat to peace and our traditional way of life is generated by our very own governments. And boy, they are surely demonstrating this uncomfortable little fact more and more with every year that passes.

Headlong into the abyss

In a previous essay, Phaedrus illustrated our decline as a society from proud, independent innovators, creators and producers to decadent, welfare-sucking idlers by means of comparing this process to the progressive slicing-up of a salami sausage. We saw how the incremental implementation of very many small steps over very many years could result in our grudging acceptance of something so utterly vile that, had it been imposed in its entirety in a single step, would have resulted in instant, boiling mad, bloody revolution and the swift destruction of the audacious rogues responsible for it.

Today more than ever, we live in a world which our forefathers could never have conceived of. It is verging on the most dreadful dystopia imaginable - and growing sicker still at an ever increasing rate. The salami is being sliced more thickly now than at any previous time. It's becoming increasingly harder not to choke on it. Presumably the Internet is the reason for this. Those who govern us have been forced to speed up the timeline for the roll-out of their Agenda as awareness of their nefarious activities continues to propagate at near-light speed via the new electronic media. Their stunts are becoming ever more transparent as the pressure to rush new initiatives through in haste increases.

Our founding fathers knew all about tyranny. They themselves fled it yet later had no choice but to stand up and fight against it. They sent the British packing, then set down to draft the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which they tried their very best to make future-proof. The fact that much of these principles survive to this day is testament to the care they took and the forces of evil they foresaw which would threaten it and the young country's future citizens. Notwithstanding this sterling and vital effort, however, our rights have been constantly under attack almost from the point the ink dried on these noble documents.

The mechanism the Jews adopted to attack these precious rights and freedoms has been based in large part on very many tiny incremental changes, the consequences of which only become fully apparent very, very much later. As you would expect from a race like the Jews, this process is an insidious one and barely discernable to the average American. Due to this, it has proved stunningly successful (for the elites) and brought decent people everywhere into dejection, apathy, loss of hope and a dangerous sense of inevitability concerning our collective slide into this gaping cultural and moral abyss which we have seen yawning ever wider before us since the end of WW2.

Jefferson warned us that the price of Liberty was eternal vigilance. I believe this is what he really meant by those famous words: watching out for small, seemingly innocuous changes which individually may not appear to amount to much at all. The real challenge facing us if we are ever to cast off this Evil that encircles us and reclaim our freedom is how to safeguard it in perpetuity so it can never again be successfully undermined. The cycle of decline begins whenever the very first chink is made in the armor of such protective laws which confer upon us our due rights and freedoms. The single most effective measure we can take to prevent this is to ensure no Jew is ever again permitted to influence public policy - either directly or by proxy, in any way, both today - and for all time to come. A true "government by the people for the people" must be founded in accordance with the principles this blogger set out at the commencement of this new blog.

An eternal curse on mankind?

Hello, Gentiles everywhere and welcome to Phaedrus's new blog. I would just like to extend a particularly warm welcome to readers from Northern Europe, or readers of Northern European decent, wherever they may be, in our world-wide diaspora.

I was in two minds about blogging again. By the time October 2008 came around, I figured I had just about reached a final, fixed position on the causes of 90% the ills of this world and that there was really nothing more I could say. My position today remains as totally rock solid now as it did back then. However, I will restate it here now, for the benefit of new readers, or for anyone who didn't quite get the message last time around.

In essence, a way must be found to deal with the Jewish Problem. I personally don't know how to formulate a suitable mechanism for achieving this objective; I can only state what the objective is and that it is imperative that it be somehow brought about. Greater minds than mine will have to come up with an approach that will bring about this solution for an infinitely better and more peaceful world. What is the objective? It has to be a global one and It is quite simply expressed in these 3 Golden Rules I lay before you now:

1. There must be no place in public life for the Jew in any country around the world. The Jews must be removed from all positions of public influence. This means there must be no Jews in politics, no Jews in the media, none in the judiciary, none in lobbying groups, none in public corporations, none in genetic research, none in communications, none in advertising and none in banking and finance. This list is not intended to be exhaustive and it is expected that its scope will need to be extended in future as new and novel technologies and situations arise.

2. Jews must never be allowed to exercise influence in any of these areas through the use of Gentile proxies. Gentiles who have allowed themselves to become tools of the Jews will need to be dealt with severely as a warning to others that such liaisons are totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated in any form.

3. A way must be found to ensure that this state of affairs is set in stone for all time. The mechanism must be 100% resistant to even the slightest compromise over time. We must be able to heave a giant, collective sigh of relief in the sure and certain knowledge that this age-old curse on mankind has been consigned to history for ever.

Note that in the construction of this protective mechanism, we must be able to look ahead and ask ourselves one key question: "is there a possibility that, in say 1,000 years from now, this measure we are considering could have become compromised with the result that the Jews are yet again evading containment and rising once more to positions of power and influence over us?" If, after due consideration, the answer should turn out to be "yes" or "maybe" then the measure duly fails. It must be discarded or modified until such time as a fresh or revised proposal arises which, when subjected to the same test, gives rise to the unequivocal answer: "no, not a chance; never."

If our forefathers had applied such test when formulating documents such as the Constitution and Bill of Rights, it my belief we would not be in the perilous position we yet again find ourselves today.

Why is it so vital for us to devote so much time and effort to the Jewish Problem? Well in essence, there is something unique in this particular race of entities that is totally poisonous to free and well-ordered societies - and always has been since the dawn of recorded history. I cannot ascribe any one particular contributory factor which might account for this. Maybe it's a heritable trait passed on genetically; maybe it's cultural - or perhaps Talmudic. Maybe it is a combination of all three. It would be interesting to know, but of academic value only. In fact such explorations should be heavily deprecated, since they can easily be exploited by the Jews to their own advantage. When in doubt, always refer to the foregoing Golden Rules, wherein the only real protection for ourselves, our children and our children's children's children can ever truly lie.