Problem - Reaction - Solution: an age-old con re-examined

1. The ruling power, in its own interests, contrives a phony event to provoke public outrage against some innocent third party or thing.

2. The public, duly outraged, demands 'something' be done.

3. The ruling power, in response, provides a 'solution' to the problem it had itself

originally created.

Let's expand a bit. I know others have examined this concept before (most recently of note, David Icke, although he was not the first but all credit to you nonetheless, Mr. Icke). In any event, it is very worthy of further examination in the light of the times we currently live in.

We are witnessing the unfolding of an extraordinary age where our fundamental freedoms and rights are under serious and sustained attack by those who purport to rule us by our consent. The country where this disturbing state of affairs is most obviously the case, and has been for a generation now, is the UK. Rights and freedoms have been removed at a rate not seen there for nearly 800 years, and on the flimsy pretext of preventing possible 'terrorist attacks.' But the trend is far from confined to one country and we have seen similar attacks on our rights here in the US and further afield as well.

The problem-reaction-solution hypothesis requires a trigger event. In the US, the most prominent for many decades was the 9/11 attacks in New York (which of course we now know were carried out by Israel with George Bush's blessing). There have been other, less high-profile attempts since then, with various individuals trying to blow up aircraft with bombs concealed in their clothing (most notably the "underpants bomber" who was kindly escorted on board a US flight by none other than the US intelligence services, incredibly).

This is the way the classical model for this scam has worked in the past. Some kind of outrage takes place; the people demand action; the government complies, but the measures have "unintended negative consequences" for our personal freedoms (unintended, yeah, right). But recently, the steps involved have become a little flaky. Whilst we have seen no end to the pressure to curtail our rights and attack our freedoms (Stage 3 of the process) there has been a distinct lack of drive for such measures to come about from stages 1 and 2.

It is as if our governments were giving up on trying to fool us that it is all about 'protecting us' from some external threat. After all, since the truth about 9/11 broke free of the MSM pen, there have scarcely been massed columns of outraged citizens marching down Pennsylvania Avenue demanding more of their liberties be sacrificed, have there? Each new phony, government-orchestrated "terror" alarm is met by increasing levels of scepticism if not outright disbelief by an increasingly better-informed public.

More and more, in the age of the Internet and the ubiquitous presence of 'citizen journalists' with their vast numbers of cell phones and camcorders, Stage 1 operations appear to have been abandoned as now too risky for governments and their lackeys to carry out. Stage 2 (public outrage) which was increasingly failing to materialize anyway due to public suspicion, consequently arises no longer at all.

But hey-ho! There's nevertheless the Stage 3 'solution' to these non-existent threats: take the citizens' ancient, hard-fought rights away regardless, on the basis that there's some vague and unspecified but nonetheless serious existential threat to public safety that we cannot be told about in detail owing to, ahem, 'security considerations.'

We really must be NUTS to suffer this despicable situation to continue. As Huxley warned us more than five decades ago, the only REAL threat to peace and our traditional way of life is generated by our very own governments. And boy, they are surely demonstrating this uncomfortable little fact more and more with every year that passes.

Destroying society through the family

This blogger, like many of you, has been confounded and dismayed by the astonishing number of marriage, family and just general relationship breakdowns that occur nowadays. Confounded, that is, until a little Judao-sceptic thinking shed light on this seemingly inexorable plague on our society. The problem in my view lies with the mainstream media and it is our newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations that primarily bear responsibility for this dismal situation. And of course we all know exactly which breed of reptile owns the media...

Broadly speaking, there are two ways to screw up a newly-married couple's future happiness. The first way is the most obvious: you can simply pour poison on them. By this method you can openly assert in strident tones that the marriage is doomed to fail and its participants will never, ever, find happiness. This method may well prove effective. However, sometimes the curser may discover that instead of serving its intended purpose, it galvanizes the participants of the marriage into working harder to ensure that the relationship succeeds, simply in order to prove the curser wrong and out of spite against he or she if you will.

The second of the aforementioned methods, however, is far more deadly, yet it never reflects badly and never embarrasses the ill-wisher. Indeed, the ill-wisher is not only regarded as entirely blameless, but also as a good-hearted soul deserving of sincere thanks!

How can this be? Simply, my friends, via the diametrically-opposite technique. I postulate here that all that is necessary is for the ill-wisher to assure the participants in the relationship that life for them will be a breeze and that they have every right to expect to live happily ever after and enjoy every single moment together. 'All your dreams will come true'...'It's a match made in heaven'....'Every second you spend together should be precious.' And so on.. And so on... And so on.... This pernicious yet invisible form of curse often starts from Day One: the bride must have the "perfect wedding" where she feels she's the most special girl in the world for the day and that it's chocolates, wine and roses ever after. Everything must be the best on the wedding day; everything shiny and perfect; nothing must go wrong.

The spectacular success of this deeply devious, underhanded approach can be seen in the Sunday papers every weekend where celebrity dream-couples' broken romances litter the tabloids over multiple consecutive pages. These A-listers are the first-line victims of this hex, because they live in a bubble where every OTHER aspect of their lives can be readily controlled by their wealth and/or connections. Not so, however, when it comes to their intimate, personal relationships! The Beatles sang that money can't by love and our 'Hollywood royalty' soon find out there's a good deal else it can't buy within relationships, either.

But the foregoing is equally applicable to ordinary folks. Advice columns preach to readers that if they're not enjoying *great, mind-blowing sex* at least 5 times a day, then there's something wrong with their relationship. Plus of course, not only does the wife have to be a great cook in the kitchen, and great housewife with the duster and Hoover, but a tigress in the sack and a successful businesswoman to boot. And the man - he has to be masterful and strong and a successful breadwinner - but he must also have a sensitive side as well. He must be a great dad, a great provider, a great listener, a best friend, a soul mate....you name it. So much is expected of both parties, who are each encouraged to believe they can expect so much of each other in return! When such mantras as these are repeatedly broadcast from every Jewish media orifice in existence, who could ever deny their self-evident truth?

Giving newly married couples the idea that married life is simply heaven and should constantly be like living in a wonderful dream is nothing less than a recipe for shattering disappointments and misery and is a guaranteed way to break up the best of matches in very short order. So what does our woeful wife do, when she discovers further down the line that marriage isn't quite what it was cracked up to be? In a mix of despair and disillusionment she writes to a newspaper column "agony aunt" or asks some "guru" on a radio show phone-in. Can you guess the likely ethnicity of the 'advisor'? Or the likely advice she'll get? "Leave him, he obviously doesn't love you." Bet your bottom dollar that'll be what it boils down to! And if there are children involved, so much the better as far as the Jews are concerned. They HATE us and the "family" is just another obstacle to the change they want to see come about: BIG change in the shape of the ruination of decent society and them reigning over the ensuing chaos ever-after.

The Invisible Empire

Occult actually means hidden in Latin. This little known fact is highly appropriate and germane to the subject of this blog. Empires rise and fall throughout history but there's one that has always been in the ascendency, notwithstanding its periodic (and at times spectacular) setbacks: the Jewish Empire. Our studies take us to many different places. The fields of study nowadays are vast. There is ONE field of study at least that is guaranteed to repay handsomely the time devoted to it: the long, tortuous and fascinating history of the Jews. Take a look at the abundantly rich resources freely available at Frank Welzner's Jew Watch (www. jewwatch.com).

Every American absolutely needs to know this stuff!

Headlong into the abyss

In a previous essay, Phaedrus illustrated our decline as a society from proud, independent innovators, creators and producers to decadent, welfare-sucking idlers by means of comparing this process to the progressive slicing-up of a salami sausage. We saw how the incremental implementation of very many small steps over very many years could result in our grudging acceptance of something so utterly vile that, had it been imposed in its entirety in a single step, would have resulted in instant, boiling mad, bloody revolution and the swift destruction of the audacious rogues responsible for it.

Today more than ever, we live in a world which our forefathers could never have conceived of. It is verging on the most dreadful dystopia imaginable - and growing sicker still at an ever increasing rate. The salami is being sliced more thickly now than at any previous time. It's becoming increasingly harder not to choke on it. Presumably the Internet is the reason for this. Those who govern us have been forced to speed up the timeline for the roll-out of their Agenda as awareness of their nefarious activities continues to propagate at near-light speed via the new electronic media. Their stunts are becoming ever more transparent as the pressure to rush new initiatives through in haste increases.

Our founding fathers knew all about tyranny. They themselves fled it yet later had no choice but to stand up and fight against it. They sent the British packing, then set down to draft the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which they tried their very best to make future-proof. The fact that much of these principles survive to this day is testament to the care they took and the forces of evil they foresaw which would threaten it and the young country's future citizens. Notwithstanding this sterling and vital effort, however, our rights have been constantly under attack almost from the point the ink dried on these noble documents.

The mechanism the Jews adopted to attack these precious rights and freedoms has been based in large part on very many tiny incremental changes, the consequences of which only become fully apparent very, very much later. As you would expect from a race like the Jews, this process is an insidious one and barely discernable to the average American. Due to this, it has proved stunningly successful (for the elites) and brought decent people everywhere into dejection, apathy, loss of hope and a dangerous sense of inevitability concerning our collective slide into this gaping cultural and moral abyss which we have seen yawning ever wider before us since the end of WW2.

Jefferson warned us that the price of Liberty was eternal vigilance. I believe this is what he really meant by those famous words: watching out for small, seemingly innocuous changes which individually may not appear to amount to much at all. The real challenge facing us if we are ever to cast off this Evil that encircles us and reclaim our freedom is how to safeguard it in perpetuity so it can never again be successfully undermined. The cycle of decline begins whenever the very first chink is made in the armor of such protective laws which confer upon us our due rights and freedoms. The single most effective measure we can take to prevent this is to ensure no Jew is ever again permitted to influence public policy - either directly or by proxy, in any way, both today - and for all time to come. A true "government by the people for the people" must be founded in accordance with the principles this blogger set out at the commencement of this new blog.

All the flavors of Jew

You know, it's nothing short of extraordinary. Once upon a time I only thought of the Jews as a single ethnic and religious grouping. It was a simple matter to blithly refer to the Self-Chosen as just "the Jews" and that alone would be identification enough.

But curiously, times have changed. It seems this appellation is no longer supportable. Some regard the word "Jew" alone as antisemitic! Instead, we are told, we should discriminate. We cannot tar all Jews with the same brush. They're not ALL conniving shysters hell-bent on destroying ordered society and stealing all our money. No. No - or so we are told. We are told it's dangerous to generalize about the Jews. The real problem is not the entirety of the Jewish people which form the Jewish diaspora, but rather a very few, distinct branches both within and (remarkably!) outside of it.

Most people plant the blame for the collective, rancid reputation of the Chosen Ones at the door of the Zionists. Then there is another strain we're told are more likely the cause of all life's problems: the Ashkanazis. Still others warn us that the real danger is the ultra-orthodox Jew. Becoming a bit confusing, isn't it? There are several other sub-species of these ubiquitous vultures, too: the Maranites, the Yemenites, the Reform, the Messianic, the secular, the Hisadic and so on to name but a few of an astonishing array of flavors. "Most Jews are just decent folk trying to get by, like you and me," we are repeatedly assured. "It's the Zionists! They're the real problem!" claim others. Or, "It's not the Jews at all, but a sinister tribe of eastern european devil-worshipers that arose around the foothills of the Carpathian mountains and adopted Judaism as a flag of convenience."

There are several variations on these themes, dear reader. The common denominator of them all, however, is that we are urged not to lump all "Jews" in the same basket, but to exercise some discrimination and recognize that it is a small and unrepresentative minority of irregular elements within the diaspora that constitute the real problem. "The vast majority of Jews are fundamentally decent, peace-loving people," their apologists at great pains to assure us. Yeah, right.

It's a confusing picture as I'm sure you will agree. You may well wonder with all these different varieties of the Children of Israel - who have clearly not merely survived but thrived into the 21st century - quite who it was Hitler actually wiped out between 1933-45! We can but marvel at the Jews' remarkable ability to re-establish themselves so successfully after having been virtually exterminated (as they would have us believe) less than 3 generations ago.

So yes, it's confusing; something of a smokescreen in fact, the skeptics might say.

No doubt it might be in the Jews' best interests to highlight all these various subtle ethnic and cultural distinctions that come within the burgeoning umbrella of Judaism, but Phaedrus at least finds the whole thing very unconvincing. Aside from which, it seems breathtakingly hypocritical for the Jews to urge us to discriminate between them when they have relentlessly brow-beaten, hectored and berated the rest of us for decades, if not centuries, on the need to eschew all forms of discrimination and embrace instead their discredited dogma that we are all in fact equal and essentially the same!

Come on, you duplicitous shysters. Who do you think you are fooling? you can't have it both ways.

Full-on, In-Your-Face International Corporate Communism - whether you like it or not

The Insidious creep towards Internationalism takes care to creep no more. The headlong rush towards the acknowledgment and acceptance of the concept of a Global Family and our supposed "responsibilities" toward strangers abroad, no matter how feckless, obnoxious and willfully self-destructive they may be, is now no longer a matter for philosophical conjecture, but taken as so self-evident that it is totally beyond question.

This is Trotskyism in its purest form: borderless, international Communism. Phaedrus, along with very many like minded fellows, believes however, that charity begins at home. If someone wants to give money to Haiti or Africa (a generous proportion of which will no doubt mysteriously find its way into the coffers of Jewi$h charities) then they should of course be allowed to indulge their misguided stupidity freely. This blogger for one, however, refuses to be manipulated and conned by MSM pleas for aid to such hopeless causes.

One would be better advised to cut out the Jewi$h middleman and the Africoidal tyrant, and simply flush the cash down the can. A better solution for the less gullible among us, however, is to donate instead directly to causes closer to home: disabled veterans, sick animals, a neighbor's cancer operation or whatever else takes your fancy. ANYWHERE, in short, where you can be 100% sure that your hard-earned cash wont get squandered or diverted and wind up in the back pocket of some scheming Jew. By all means give direct to worthy people in need. Please do NOT give a single penny piece to anyone via any "charitable agency" or other "helpful" middleman entity.

An eternal curse on mankind?

Hello, Gentiles everywhere and welcome to Phaedrus's new blog. I would just like to extend a particularly warm welcome to readers from Northern Europe, or readers of Northern European decent, wherever they may be, in our world-wide diaspora.

I was in two minds about blogging again. By the time October 2008 came around, I figured I had just about reached a final, fixed position on the causes of 90% the ills of this world and that there was really nothing more I could say. My position today remains as totally rock solid now as it did back then. However, I will restate it here now, for the benefit of new readers, or for anyone who didn't quite get the message last time around.

In essence, a way must be found to deal with the Jewish Problem. I personally don't know how to formulate a suitable mechanism for achieving this objective; I can only state what the objective is and that it is imperative that it be somehow brought about. Greater minds than mine will have to come up with an approach that will bring about this solution for an infinitely better and more peaceful world. What is the objective? It has to be a global one and It is quite simply expressed in these 3 Golden Rules I lay before you now:

1. There must be no place in public life for the Jew in any country around the world. The Jews must be removed from all positions of public influence. This means there must be no Jews in politics, no Jews in the media, none in the judiciary, none in lobbying groups, none in public corporations, none in genetic research, none in communications, none in advertising and none in banking and finance. This list is not intended to be exhaustive and it is expected that its scope will need to be extended in future as new and novel technologies and situations arise.

2. Jews must never be allowed to exercise influence in any of these areas through the use of Gentile proxies. Gentiles who have allowed themselves to become tools of the Jews will need to be dealt with severely as a warning to others that such liaisons are totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated in any form.

3. A way must be found to ensure that this state of affairs is set in stone for all time. The mechanism must be 100% resistant to even the slightest compromise over time. We must be able to heave a giant, collective sigh of relief in the sure and certain knowledge that this age-old curse on mankind has been consigned to history for ever.

Note that in the construction of this protective mechanism, we must be able to look ahead and ask ourselves one key question: "is there a possibility that, in say 1,000 years from now, this measure we are considering could have become compromised with the result that the Jews are yet again evading containment and rising once more to positions of power and influence over us?" If, after due consideration, the answer should turn out to be "yes" or "maybe" then the measure duly fails. It must be discarded or modified until such time as a fresh or revised proposal arises which, when subjected to the same test, gives rise to the unequivocal answer: "no, not a chance; never."

If our forefathers had applied such test when formulating documents such as the Constitution and Bill of Rights, it my belief we would not be in the perilous position we yet again find ourselves today.

Why is it so vital for us to devote so much time and effort to the Jewish Problem? Well in essence, there is something unique in this particular race of entities that is totally poisonous to free and well-ordered societies - and always has been since the dawn of recorded history. I cannot ascribe any one particular contributory factor which might account for this. Maybe it's a heritable trait passed on genetically; maybe it's cultural - or perhaps Talmudic. Maybe it is a combination of all three. It would be interesting to know, but of academic value only. In fact such explorations should be heavily deprecated, since they can easily be exploited by the Jews to their own advantage. When in doubt, always refer to the foregoing Golden Rules, wherein the only real protection for ourselves, our children and our children's children's children can ever truly lie.