Samstag, 5. Juni 2010

A Vision of the Future?

Let me tell you how it may or may not be....

If people don't wake up en masse pretty darn quick, then those toxic salami slices Phaedrus spoke about on World Peace are going to start getting thicker still:

1. The moves towards "equality" over the last half-century has only ever been a long-term Jewish plot to eradicate Old Whitey. Hitler warned us about its existence and the path of its progression over 80 years ago when he wrote Mein Kampf. In the process of this eradication, the world population will be progressively engineered towards a much lower average IQ than has hitherto been the case in our entire history.

2. Once Old Whitey has been progressively marginalized into a vulnerable minority it will be a simple matter to step up the tempo and virtually wipe us out - with the sole exception of those few, key whites who had previously accepted the Jews' 30 pieces of silver and sold out to them. At this time, there will be no races around with the brains and/or desire to fight against the next step, which will be...

3. Enslavement. As prophesied to the Jews in their so-called Holy Book, the Talmud, each Jew will have 2,700 moronic, dusky-colored slaves to do their bidding. All those Gentiles who are surplus to requirements on whatever grounds will be eliminated. This will result in what will be by far the largest genocide ever in the entire history of planet Earth.

4. Jewish paranoia and the absence of any credible external threat will cause the Chosen Ones to look suspiciously and fearfully upon those few remaining whites they once appeared so close to; those whites who sold themselves out to the Agenda and turned race traitors against their fellow whites will find themselves the unfortunate subject of feverish Jewish plotting.

5. It will inevitably become necessary for the Jews to destroy all the remaining race-traitor Gentiles. Their demise will be a swift one. None among them will be spared. As it is written in the Talmud, "Even the best among the Heathens is deserving of Death." The Jews will proceed to enact this measure for two reasons: firstly, the Talmud says it's fine, and secondly, it will alleviate their innate anxiety and paranoia.

6. Now there will only remain Jews and their docile and mentally-retarded half-breed slaves. As Hitler noted trenchantly so many decades ago:

" soon as the common foe is conquered and the danger which threatened the individual Jews is overcome and the prey secured, then the apparent harmony disappears and the original conditions set in again. Jews act in concord only when a common danger threatens them or a common prey attracts them. Where these two motives no longer exist then the most brutal egotism appears and these people who before had lived together in unity will turn into a swarm of rats that bitterly fight against each other."

The end result of this will be all the 'inferior Jews' will now become marginalized and allowed - if not overtly encouraged - to die out. Only the Jewish elite and their Rabbis will survive, together with their slave underclass. The unity and solidarity the remaining Jews formerly enjoyed will be gone forever. Under this scenario, they will inherit the Earth, but the carnage occasioned in this accomplishment will indeed be Biblical in its scale.

But then, if this blogger believed the Jews would ever see the prophesies the Talmud sets out for them come to fruition and that the future (as written by the Jews - who else?) is set in stone, he wouldn't be sitting here blogging away and making a small but nevertheless significant contribution towards derailing their infernal plans for world domination!

The Greek Debt Crisis

This debacle over Greece's membership of the Euro currency bloc is deserving of a quick mention. On the 2nd of May, the Greek government announced it had struck a deal with the IMF and the European Central Bank on a financial aid package worth around one hundred billion US dollars. The Greek government, by entering into this arrangement, have sold the people they were engaged to represent, into perpetual debt slavery. The ordinary people of Greece simply have no future worth living if they knuckle under and meekly accept this unashamed piece of criminality as a done deal.

Fortunately, from what I have seen so far, it would appear that the Greek people are rather smarter than their government would like to believe. They need to recognize, as I am sure they do, that they are utterly finished if they cooperate and go along with this plan. Phaedrus ain't no rabble rouser, so Leftie-style solutions don't spring readily from this blogger's keyboard. Nevertheless, this situation transcends normal party politics. We should all feel a sense of empathy towards a civilized people being destroyed, as we ourselves are, by the craven, insatiable greed of Jewish financiers.

The people of Greece, if they bow down before their masters on this issue, are about to be right-royally raped by them for decades to come. They will exist in a state of poverty, squalor and despair and their children can aspire merely to be beggars. The only hope for Greece is for its people to act swiftly in solidarity and hold a prolonged series of National Strikes until their filthy rotten, corrupt government (which is in league with the Internationalist bankers) is brought down and the IMF is told to shove its stolen loot where the sun don't shine. The Greeks will manage just fine if they do this. There was at one time a fine, interest-free concept known as barter before the Jews invented their "funny money" and used it to reduce us all to penury.

Free Speech and Google

I note that Google have, thus far, not taken down this blog or its illustrious forerunner, World Peace. That would be a plus point for them, all other things being equal, but things are far from equal. Some people, most frequently the Jews and their Communist cronies, have accused this blogger of 'hate speech' - this has become the inevitable cry from the enemies of freedom when they want to prevent someone from simply stating uncomfortable facts. This blogger has only ever campaigned against unjust and illegal wars and the Jews' dominant role therein - yet these reptiles brand me a hate-monger. It just shows how twisted the world they have fashioned has become.

Anyway, sadly it looks as if these enemies of Truth have once again at least partially gotten their way, because I quickly established that Google is up to its old tricks and censoring search results for this blogspot, just as they did with World Peace (interestingly, just at the point where I called for a nationwide tax boycott bandwagon). So here too, those who seek a little enlightenment on the extent of the influence of the Jews in our lives will find their curiosity goes unsatisfied. If you didn't already know the type of material posted here and what the URL for it is, you would never be able to find it, and Google could quite frankly care less.

It could be argued that whilst people have a Constitutional right to free speech enshrined in law, there is no complimentary right to be heard. At first sight, this point of view is understandable. But on deeper examination it is such a restrictive interpretation of the law that it effectively annuls that precious right to free speech in the first place. The other aspect of this matter is that it is inherently unfair, because the spectrum of 'permissible opinion' - which should be free and unfettered - is being artificially constrained. I don't see any Marxist-orientated, pro-NWO bloggers having their articles suppressed in Google search results. Curious, that.

Bloggers like Phaedrus, who hold views which are currently unfashionable (yes, that's all they are in reality and times can and do change) find ourselves effectively gagged. We cannot reach a wider audience with our 'unacceptable views' essentially because they're currently unfashionable. On the other hand, if you want to heartily praise the virtues of Marxism, globalization and multiculturalism, for example, then go right ahead! Google will ensure that your views are swiftly propagated to the four corners of the planet. Kinda stinks, doesn't it?

Christianity? Let's Trash It!

Phaedrus isn't some evangelical, Bible-thumping nut, but it strikes this blogger, who has no particular religious axe to grind, that the NWO and their Jewish cohorts have done a remarkably effective job in smearing very many perfectly decent Christians as suffering from some kind of mental illness or personality disorder. These 'opinion-formers' have utilized their media control to successfully create a link in the public mind between those who expound and proclaim Christian beliefs on the one hand and the mentally ill on the other.

Why on earth would they wish to do such a thing? Well, it doesn't require a doctorate in rocket science to figure out the reasons. The Jews' bete noire - a certain Jesus of Nazareth no less - famously eschewed greed and the pursuit of material excess. His message is one that is diametrically opposite to that of the Jews - whose interests of course require slavish adherence to earthly goals and the total abandonment of moral and spiritual values.

An interesting example in this respect is one Cliff Richard. Richard was a star of the popular music scene in Britain and has enjoyed a successful run of hits for over 40 years since he began recording in 1958. He has even charted fleetingly here in the US during the 1970s. Most of his later work (which has proved to be every bit as popular as his earlier efforts) has contained blatant, unashamed, overt Christian references. Surprisingly, given the Godless times in which we live, these songs have sold incredibly well and yielded yet more chart-toppers.

This success proved to be more than our foreskinner friends could stand, So what did the grubby little malcontents do by way of response? Astonishingly, they had the audacity to pressure the UK's leading broadcaster, the BBC (which is itself crawling with Jews) to boycott Richard's songs! The BBC, in spite of the reaction from shocked viewers and listeners who angrily denounced the proposal, nonetheless agreed to implement it! The upshot is that for many years now, Richard's melodic, wholesome and peaceful songs no longer make the playlists of Britain's dominant broadcaster.

This is a curious state of affairs indeed. But what makes it all the more curious is that so called "urban music" with its endless stream of profanities and exhortations to kill, rape and rob others; its glorification of violence, drugs, ostentatiousness and promiscuity, continues to enjoy unimpeded delivery to the ears of the country's children. Could there be any clearer evidence that Satan is in control? And not just in Britain, but here in America and right around the world, Evil is prevailing whilst good men and women shrink from speaking out. Phaedrus asks: how long can this invidious situation be permitted to continue?

An object lesson in controlling the masses: the UK elections.

The political landscape in the UK was, until very recently, a two-horse race. There were the Conservatives and the Labor Party. Broadly speaking one can translate them for our purposes here in the US into the Republicans and the Democrats respectively. But all that changed just a few weeks ago.

There was always a third party in UK politics hovering in the background. They used to call themselves the Liberals. Now they call themselves the Liberal Democrats, but the name is immaterial. They provided a third option that was never taken up by the great British electorate. But as stated above, times have changed.

British voters have become so disengaged from the two, larger mainstream parties that they have run for cover to this smaller third party - which is presumably what they were there for all along: to mop up disillusioned voters who would otherwise seek solutions from more radical parties outside the control of the NWO.

[this 3rd party with its dangerously plausible leader offer zero possibility of real change - the REAL change that so many British voters, like so many of us, are crying out for. They are basically just now fulfilling their long-term role of hoovering-up gullible, disenfranshized people who have lost faith with the cravenly corrupt mainstream parties.

For the first time ever in Britain, there was a US-style leaders' TV debate before the election. But it comes as no surprise that there were only these three parties' leaders invited. There are more than just three political parties in the UK but for some reason that doesn't require a lot of thought, only these three were represented. This is politics.

As I observed before on World Peace, the spectrum of "permissible political opinion" has been shifted progressively leftwards. It's as if today there simply isn't any viewpoint at all from the right. Even moderate right-wing ideology has been successfully abolished in Britain. There's just a gaping hole where it once stood.

A few months before this latest UK General Election, the leader of one of the UK's "far right" parties did manage to get himself some exposure, however - and on the BBC of all places. It was intended by the Marxists at the BBC to be a hatchet job. The show's audience was packed with immigrants, Homosexuals, Communists and trade-unionists.

As expected, this guest (one Nick Griffin of the British National Party) was savaged by this hostile live audience. By the end of the show, the BBC must have been patting themselves on the back for a job well done. All had gone to plan. But they were in for a shock. The trick had backfired on them very badly.

The TV viewers of the show in their homes were not as partial as the hand-picked TV audience. They could see what was going on and were not fooled by it. There was a sympathetic reaction among ordinary people for this cruel stunt the BBC had pulled. Nick Griffin's BNP went from nowhere in the polls to 22% overnight!

This caused huge consternation in the mainstream media and a firestorm of blame raged for weeks afterwards. When the dust finally settled, the MSM had learned a valuable lesson: it's infinitely better to pretend the opposition simply doesn't exist than to try to tackle it head-on with open and honest debate.

So the lesson was learned. In the week before the election itself, the TV leaders' debate was a carefully stage-managed event where only the fully-accredited, NWO-approved parties were given a platform to speak. All others were denied a voice. The powers that be can't risk the people being fully-informed. Truth for them is now recognized as an unconquerable foe.

Old People Don't Count

Well, actually, anyone over 25 doesn't really count. That would seem to be the age at which we expire and become nothing more than a whining nuisance to society, so far as the New World Order and its proponents are concerned.

The reasoning is pretty clear. The NWO demands change - sweeping change - and fast. The faster the better. The likes of the Rothschilds and the Rockerfellers are impatient. They need to see their infernal baby born with the absolute minimum of further delay.

Old people are resistant to change. They are by nature conservative, and Conservatives are not keen to embrace new ideas - particularly when such new ideas are poisonous to the common good. Hence the tendency, especially here in the West, to marginalize and ignore the elderly.

All this is, of course, the ideology of Trotsky. Trotsky the little Jewish agitator, unlike some of his contemporaries, was keen to export Communism beyond the boundaries of the country of its practical inception. He came to a sticky end in Mexico for his efforts. It is regrettable that he was not disposed of before his poisonous, trouble-making ideology was propagated, however.

This blogger doesn't advocate violent solutions if they can possibly be avoided. The aim of Phaedrus has always been to seek peaceful answers where such are practicable. But if you happen to be reading this and choose to bury an ice-pick in the skull of some grubby little Jewish Communist trouble-maker in the manner that befell Trotsky, then this blogger at least would find it in his heart to forgive you.

Coming soon to a ghetto near you: the Climate Refugees

Diligent research by public-spirited individuals has strongly suggested that the concept of global warming or "climate change" if you prefer, is essentially a complete fabrication. Broadly, the researchers claim something along the lines of the following:-

Climate change is a natural process which occurs anyway

Climate change is not man-made

The earth is in fact cooling rather than heating up

Why, we should ask ourselves, if these claims are true, would our governments want to mislead us with false evidence to the contrary? The obvious answer, and the one that most people have quickly pointed to, is that it is a ruse to squeeze whatever further taxes out of us they can. In other words, their prime motive is simply greed.

Phaedrus takes no position on the evidence for or against climate change. There was once a time, I admit, before I was in full possession of the facts, that I believed that global warming was for real and that there was no stopping it. The process had in fact reached a tipping point from which a self reinforcing spiral would inevitably lead to further and further warming no matter how much we cut our "greenhouse gas" emissions. I have, since that time, and upon reading the evidence submitted by the so-called "deniers", changed my view to one of being a climate change skeptic. But I am not a scientist and never will be. My views on the science are worthless. However, I have come up with a rather more imaginative motivation on the part of the world's governments than that of pure greed alone.

No one with a shred of common sense can have failed to notice that the Agenda being pursued by the New World Order calls for promoting population churning or "demographic aggregation." We have been witnessing this ugly phenomenon proceeding at an ever increasing pace since the end of World War II. It results in the juxtaposition of ethnically and culturally incompatible peoples who often and quite understandably find it deeply disagreeable to have to live cheek by jowl with one another. Others, of the Marxist or wooly-headed Liberal persuasion, on the other hand, embrace this process with much enthusiasm. And if those whites who embrace it should themselves interbreed with these foreign races, as the NWOers are keen as hell for them to do, then so much the better. For the powers that be, the pace of this phenomenon can never be fast enough.

It is the requirement to satisfy the foregoing imperative that is, in Phaedrus's opinion, the true ulterior motive behind the climate change/global warming agenda. If our governments can sell us the lie that our selfish western lifestyles are the cause of rising temperatures, deforestation, desertification, floods, storms and droughts in distant countries, then they can easily make us feel personally responsible when such events occur. If the broad mass of people swallow this, they will not only be prepared to stump up higher taxes, they may also feel they have a moral obligation to welcome "climate refugees" fleeing to the West for safe haven from their impoverished countries of origin. We saw some attempt to do this with the Haiti disaster some months back, in fact - and that was an earthquake for which your lifestyle is entirely blameless!

So, Whitey, YOU have a moral obligation to re-home these desperate and hard-done-by people who, thanks to you and your gas-guzzling SUV, now have nowhere else to live. But it has nothing to do with compassion for others and everything to do with demographic aggregation: creating a coffee-colored world population which will be so dumbed down and easily duped that the Jews will have no remaining obstacles in their path to create the Reich of Slavery that the Talmud promises them and for which they have for so long insidiously and guilefully striven.

What would Hitler do?

Adolf Hitler! Does that name shock you? If so, why? Probably because the Jewish-controlled mainstream media have striven tirelessly over the course of the last eight decades to demonize this man and the proud, nationalist movement he brought to prominence in 1930s Germany. From the standpoint of today, the media would have us believe that Hitler had no saving graces at all. He was an evil man with ideas so dangerous and deranged that they must never even be discussed! But is that really a fair assessment, or merely a cunning device to obscure the truth?

Granted Hitler was never a great admirer of the Jews. But what we are never permitted to know was that in his early years, Hitler was very tolerant towards the Jews and even, in his own words, felt a sense of "abhorrence" when he encountered anti-semitism on the part of others. What changed him? The answer lies in Hitler's relentless observation of the world around him. Hitler was an obsessive thinker and rationalist who refused to take anything at face value. He was always awake to the possibility of an ulterior motive. This awareness is what opened his eyes to the true nature of the Jews and their truly extraordinary "religion" - a belief system which is nothing short of Satanic once one takes the trouble to examine it in any depth.

Phaedrus has remarked before on a number of occasions that an 'anti-Semite' is simply a fully-informed Liberal. This blogger has yet to meet a wooly-headed Liberal whose dozy and complacent mind-set hasn't been irreparably shattered after being given a little lecture on the contents of the Talmud; in particular its directions in regard to dealings with non-Jews and the fact that we Gentiles are regarded by Jews as pretty much the lowest form of life on the planet and only fit to serve them as slaves. Even the best among us, the Talmud declares, "is deserving of death." It therefore concerns me greatly - and should concern all other non-Jews - that people with such a hateful mentality are controlling the world in which we live. This is a situation which simply cannot be allowed to continue.

It has been the fashion of late to include Hitler in all sorts of colorful conspiracy theories. I have yet to see any compelling evidence that Hitler was anything other than a patriot who cared deeply about his country and his people. Nothing within Mein Kampf suggests the least bit otherwise. Having said that, he was disastrously bellicose and his own indefatigable belief in the superiority of the German army above all others led him to reach too far too soon. This hubris destroyed Germany (leaving a third of it in the hands of Poland) and caused terrible suffering both at home and in wider Europe. Nevertheless, it is this blogger's belief at the time of writing this, that Hitler was a gifted visionary who was only let down by his inability to appreciate the immensity of the task he set for himself. I remain of the view that he acted in good faith throughout with the best interests of Germany at heart.

Below you will find a list of my own personal favorite quotes, in no particular order, from Volume 1 of Hitler's aforementioned Magnum Opus. You will see, if your eyes are open, that the problems that beset Germany in the 1920s are strikingly similar to those that we see around us today in just about every Western country. Put aside whatever prejudices you have about this remarkable man for a moment. Take a look at what Hitler actually had to say in his own words - and not what others tell you he said.

Enjoy, then ask yourself: If Hitler were alive today, what would he do?

"There are very few Jews in Linz. In the course of centuries the Jews who lived there had become Europeanized in external appearance and were so much like other human beings that I even looked upon them as Germans. The reason why I did not then perceive the absurdity of such an illusion was that the only external mark which I recognized as distinguishing them from us was the practice of their strange religion. As I thought that they were persecuted on account of their Faith my aversion to hearing remarks against them grew almost into a feeling of abhorrence, I did not in the least suspect that there could be such a thing as systematic anti-Semitism. Then I came to Vienna....

"The devastating influence of this parliamentary institution might not easily be recognized by those who read the Jewish Press, unless the reader has learned how to think independently and examine the facts for himself. This institution is primarily responsible for the crowded inrush of mediocre people into the field of politics. Confronted with such a phenomenon, a man who is endowed with real qualities of leadership will be tempted to refrain from taking part in political life; because under these circumstances the situation does not call for a man who has a capacity for constructive statesmanship but rather for a man who is capable of bargaining for the favor of the majority. Thus the situation will appeal to small minds and will attract them accordingly.

"Marxism's final objective was and is and will continue to be the destruction of all non-Jewish national States.

"To sum up, the following must be borne in mind: That every attempt to combat a Weltanschauung by means of force will turn out futile in the end if the struggle fails to take the form of an offensive for the establishment of an entirely new spiritual order of things. It is only in the struggle between two Weltanschauungen that physical force, consistently and ruthlessly applied, will eventually turn the scales in its own favor. It was here that the fight against Marxism had hitherto failed.

"....The same applies to diseases in nations. So long as these diseases are not of a catastrophic character, the population will slowly accustom itself to them and later succumb. It is then a stroke of luck - although a bitter one - when Fate decides to interfere in this slow process of decay and suddenly brings the victim face to face with the final stage of the disease.

"The life which the Jew lives as a parasite thriving on the substance of other nations and States has resulted in developing that specific character which Schopenhauer once described when he spoke of the Jew as 'The Great Master of Lies'. The kind of existence which he leads forces the Jew to the systematic use of falsehood, just as naturally as the inhabitants of northern climates are forced to wear warm clothes.

He can live among other nations and States only as long as he succeeds in persuading them that the Jews are not a distinct people but the representatives of a religions faith who thus constitute a 'religious community', though this be of a peculiar character.

As a matter of fact, however, this is the first of his great falsehoods. He is obliged to conceal his own particular character and mode of life that he may be allowed to continue his existence as a parasite among the nations. The greater the intelligence of the individual Jew, the better will he succeed in deceiving others. His success in this line may even go so far that the people who grant him hospitality may be led to believe that the Jew among them is a genuine Frenchman, for instance, or Englishman or German or Italian, who just happens to belong to a religious denomination which is different from that prevailing in these countries.

[the seeming unity of Jews is illusory]

"....But as soon as the common foe is conquered and the danger which threatened the individual Jews is overcome and the prey secured, then the apparent harmony disappears and the original conditions set in again. Jews act in concord only when a common danger threatens them or a common prey attracts them. Where these two motives no longer exist then the most brutal egotism appears and these people who before had lived together in unity will turn into a swarm of rats that bitterly fight against each other.

"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He [the great German philosopher, Schopenhauer] called the Jew "The Great Master of lies". Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.

[on latent greatness]

"....War offers an excellent occasion for observing this phenomenon. In times of distress, when the others despair, apparently harmless boys suddenly spring up and become heroes, full of determination, undaunted in the presence of Death and manifesting wonderful powers of calm reflection under such circumstances. If such an hour of trial did not come nobody would have thought that the soul of a hero lurked in the body of that beardless youth. A special impulse is almost always necessary to bring a man of genius into the foreground. The sledge hammer of Fate which strikes down the one so easily suddenly finds the counter/impact of steel when it strikes at the other. And, after the common shell of everyday life is broken, the core that lay hidden in it is displayed to the eyes of an astonished world. This surrounding world then grows obstinate and will not believe that what had seemed so like itself is really of that different quality so suddenly displayed. This is a process which is repeated probably every time a man of outstanding significance appears.

Though an inventor, for example, does not establish his fame until the very day that he carries through his invention, it would be a mistake to believe that the creative genius did not become alive in him until that moment. From the very hour of his birth the spark of genius is living with the man who has been endowed with the real creative faculty. True genius is an innate quality. It can never be the result of education or training.

"...But not even the slightest trace of idealism exists in the Jewish character. The Jew has never been a nomad [in the true sense of the word] but always a parasite, battening on the substance of others. If he occasionally abandoned regions where he had hitherto lived he did not do it voluntarily. He did it because from time to time he was driven out by people who were tired of having their hospitality abused by such guests. Jewish self expansion is a parasitic phenomenon - since the Jew is always looking for new pastures for his race.

"As long as the German people, in the War of 1914, continued to believe that they were fighting for ideals they stood firm. As soon as they were told the they were fighting only for their daily bread they began to give up the struggle.

[on eugenics]

"For as soon as the natural struggle for existence which allows only the healthy and strong individuals to survive is replaced by a sheer craze to 'save' feeble and even diseased creatures at any cost. And thus the seeds are sown for a human progeny which will become more and more miserable from one generation to another, as long as Nature's will is scorned.

"One has good grounds to be suspicious in regard to any new idea, or any doctrine or philosophy, any political or economical movement, which tries to deny everything that the past has produced or to present it as inferior and worthless. Any renovation which is really beneficial to human progress will always have to begin its constructive work at the level where the last stones of the structure have been laid.

[this quote is very interesting inasmuch as the situation Hitler admiringly describes so obviously no longer pertains in today's British armed forces]

"England has always had the armament which she needed. She always fought with those weapons which were necessary for success. She sent mercenary troops to fight as long as mercenaries sufficed; but she never hesitated to draw heavily and deeply from the best blood of the whole nation when victory could be obtained only by such a sacrifice. And in every case the fighting spirit, dogged determination and the use of brutal means in conducting military operations have always remained the same.

"The State is a community of living beings who have kindred physical and spiritual natures, organized for the purpose of assuring the conservation of their own kind and to help towards fulfilling those ends which Providence has assigned to that particular race or racial branch. Therein, and therein alone; lie the purpose and meaning of a State.

"....That is why the Jews have always formed a State within the State. One of the most ingenious tricks ever devised has been that of sailing the Jewish ship-of-state under the flag of Religion and thus securing that tolerance which Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious faiths. But the Mosaic Law is really nothing else than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race.

[on control of the populace]

"In order to strengthen his political position, [the Jew] directed his efforts towards removing the barrier of racial and civic discrimination, which had hitherto hindered his advance at every turn.. With characteristic tenacity he championed the cause of religious tolerance for this purpose; and in the Freemason organization, which had fallen completely into his hands, he found a magnificent weapon which helped him to achieve his ends. Government circles, as well as the higher sections of the political and commercial bourgeoisie, fell a prey to his plans through his manipulation of the Masonic net, though they themselves did not even suspect what was happening. only the people as such, or rather the masses which were just becoming conscious of their own power and were beginning to use it in the fight for their rights and liberties, had hitherto escaped the grip of the Jew. At least his influence had not yet penetrated to the deeper and wider sections of the people. This was unsatisfactory to him. The most important phase of this policy was therefore to secure control of the people. .....Thus another weapon beside that of Freemasonry would have to be secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began gradually to control public life in its entirety. He began to drive it along the road which he had chosen to reach his own ends; for he was now in a position to create and direct that force which, under the name of 'public opinion' is better known today than it was some decades ago.

"Simultaneously the Jew gave himself the air of thirsting after knowledge. He lauded every phase of progress, particularly those phases which led to the ruin of others; for he judges all progress and development from the standpoint of the advantages which these bring to his own people. When it brings him no such advantages he is the deadly enemy of enlightenment and hates all culture which is real culture as such. All the knowledge which he acquires in the schools of others is exploited by him exclusively in the service of his own race. Even more watchfully than ever before, he now stood guard over his Jewish nationality. Though bubbling over with 'enlightenment', 'progress', liberty', 'humanity', etc., his first care was to preserve the racial integrity of his own people. He occasionally bestowed one of his female members on an influential Christian; but the racial stock of his male descendants was always preserved fundamentally unmixed. He poisons the blood of others but preserves his own blood unadulterated. The Jew scarcely ever marries a Christian girl, but the Christian takes a Jewess to wife.The mongrels that are a result of this latter union always declare themselves on the Jewish side. Thus a part of the higher nobility in particular became completely degenerate. The Jew was well aware of this fact and systematically used this means of disarming the intellectual leaders of the opposite race. To mask his tactics and fool his victims, he talks of the equality of all men, no matter what their race or color may be. And the simpletons begin to believe him.

"...With this manifestation of innate modesty, so typical of the Jew, he trumpeted his virtues before the world until finally the world actually began to believe him. Those who refused to share this belief were considered to be doing him an injustice. Thus after a little while he began to twist things around, so as to make it appear that it was he who had always been wronged.... There were really some particularly foolish people who could not help pitying this poor, unfortunate creature of a Jew.

"The Jew's astuteness, or rather his utter unscrupulousness, in money affairs enabled him to exact new income from the princes, to squeeze the money out of them and then have it spent as quickly as possible. Every Court had its 'Court Jews', as this plague was called, who tortured the innocent victims until they were driven to despair; while at the same time this Jew provided the means which the princes squandered on their own pleasures. It is not to be wondered at that these ornaments of the human race became the recipients of official honors and even were admitted into the ranks of the hereditary nobility, thus contributing not only to expose that social institution to ridicule but also to contaminate it from the inside.

"The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes in the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate. For as long as a people remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of their blood, they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardized people. That is why the Jew systematically endeavors to lower the racial quality of a people by permanently adulterating the blood of the individuals who make up that people.

"Democracy, as practiced in Western Europe today, is the forerunner of Marxism. In fact, the latter would not be conceivable without the former. Democracy is the breeding ground on which the bacilli of the Marxist world pest can grow and spread. By the introduction of parliamentarianism, democracy produced an abortion of filth and fire, the creative fire of which, however, seems to have died out.

"The demand that it should be made impossible for the defective people to continue to propagate defective offspring is a demand that is based on the most reasonable grounds, and its proper fulfillment is the most human task that mankind has to face. Unhappy and undeserved suffering in millions of cases will be spared, with the result that there will be a gradual improvement in national health.

[on poverty of aspiration]

"What station in life can such a person fill, to whom nothing is sacred, who has never experienced anything noble but, on the contrary, has been intimately acquainted with the lowest kind of human existence? This child of three has got into the habit of reviling all authority by the time his is fifteen. He has been acquainted only with moral filth and vileness, everything being excluded that might stimulate his thought towards higher things. And now this young specimen of humanity enters the school of life.

He leads the same kind of life which was exemplified for him by his father during his childhood. He loiters about and comes home at all hours. He now even blackguards that broken hearted being who gave him birth. He curses God and the world and finally ends up in a House of Correction for young people. There he gets the final polish.

And his bourgeois contemporaries are astonished at the lack of 'patriotic enthusiasm' which this young 'citizen' manifests. Day after day the bourgeois world are witnesses to the phenomenon of spreading poison among the people through the instrumentality of the theater and the cinema, gutter journalism and obscene books; and yet they are astonished at the deplorable 'moral standards' and 'national indifference' of the masses. As if the cinema bilge and the gutter press and suchlike could inculcate knowledge of the greatness of one's country, apart entirely from the earlier education of the individual.

"One truth which must always be borne in mind is that the majority can never replace the man. The majority represents not only ignorance but also cowardice. And just as a hundred blockheads do not equal one man of wisdom, so a hundred buffoons are incapable of any political line of action that requires moral strength and fortitude.

"...The broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victim to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large scale falsehoods. It would never enter their minds to fabricate colossal untruths....

"Where there are various enemies who are split up into divergent groups it will be necessary to classify them all together as forming one solid front, so that the mass of followers in a popular movement may see only one common enemy against whom they have to fight. Such uniformity intensifies their belief in the justice of their own cause and strengthens their feeling of hostility towards the opponent.

"What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life, into the mystery of which I penetrated little by little. Was there any shady undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not participate? On putting the probing knife carefully into that kind of abscess one immediately discovered, like a maggot in a putrescent body, a little Jew who was often blinded by the sudden light.

"Man has become great through perpetual struggle. In perpetual peace his greatness must decline.

[on the Jewish mind-set]

"It aims its attack especially against all men of character who refuse to fall into line with the Jewish efforts to obtain control over the State or who appear dangerous to the Jews merely because of their superior intelligence. For in order to incur the enmity of the Jew it is not necessary to show any open hostility towards him. It is quite sufficient if one be considered capable of opposing the Jew sometime in the future or using his abilities and character to enhance the power and position of a nation which the Jew finds hostile to himself.

The Jewish instinct, which never fails where these problems have to be dealt with, readily discerns the true mentality of those whom the Jew meets in everyday life; and those who are not of a kindred spirit with him may be sure of being listed among his enemies. Since the Jew is not the object of aggression but the aggressor himself, he considers as his enemies not only those who attack him but also those who may be capable of resisting him. The means which he employs to break people of this kind, who may show themselves decent and upright, are not the open means generally used in honorable conflict, but falsehood and calumny.

He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conduct is so appalling that one really cannot be surprised if in the imagination of our people the Jew is pictured as the incarnation of Satan and the symbol of evil.

The ignorance of the broad masses as regards the inner character of the Jew, and the lack of instinct and insight that our upper classes display, are some of the reasons which explain how it is that so many people fall an easy prey to the systematic campaign of falsehood which the Jew carries on.

While the upper classes, with their innate cowardliness, turn away from anyone whom the Jew thus attacks with lies and calumny, the common people are credulous of everything, whether because of their ignorance or their simple-mindedness. Government authorities wrap themselves up in a robe of silence, but more frequently they persecute the victims of Jewish attacks in order to stop the campaign in the Jewish Press. To the fatuous mind of a government official such a line of conduct appears to be belong to the policy of upholding the authority of the State and preserving public order.

[on the creation of a Jewish state]

"When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they are really aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high school for the training of other swindlers.

[on the speciousness of the Jewish press]

"It is for the intellectual classes that [German newspapers such as the Frankfurter Zeitung and Berliner Tageblatt] are written, the tone being adapted to them, and it is over these people that such papers have an influence. While studiously avoiding all forms of expression that might strike the reader as crude, the poison is injected from other vials into the hearts of the clientele. The effervescent tone and fine phraseology lull the readers into believing that a love for knowledge and moral principle is the sole driving force that determines the policy of such papers, whereas in reality these features represent a cunning way of disarming any opposition that might be directed against the Jews and their press.

They make such a parade of respectability that the imbecile readers are all the more ready to believe that the excesses which other papers indulge in are only of a mild nature and not such as to warrant legal action being taken against them. Indeed such action might trespass on "the freedom of the Press," that expression being a euphemism under which such papers escape legal punishment for deceiving the public and poisoning the public mind. Hence the authorities are very slow indeed to take any steps against these journalistic bandits for fear of immediately alienating the sympathy of the so-called respectable Press. A fear that is only too well founded, for the moment any attempt is made to proceed against any member of the gutter press all the others rush to its assistance at once, not indeed to support its policy but simply and solely to defend the principle of freedom of the Press and liberty of public opinion. This outcry will succeed in cowering the most stalwart; for it comes from the mouth of what is (wrongly) regarded as decent journalism.

"In Journalistic circles it is a pleasing custom to speak of the Press as a 'Great Power' within the State. As a matter of fact its importance is immense. One cannot easily overestimate it, for the Press continues the work of education even in adult life.

[on the subversive nature of a 'free press' on the innocent and gullible]

"...It is an all-important interest of the State and a national duty to prevent these people from falling into the hands of false, ignorant or even evil-minded teachers. Therefore it is the duty of the State to supervise their education and prevent every form of offense in this respect. Particular attention should be paid to the Press; for its influence on these people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of all; since its effect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies in the uniform and persistent repetition of its teaching. Here, if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means should converge towards the same end. It must not be led astray by the will-o'-the-wisp of so-called 'freedom of the Press', or be talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding from the nation that which is good and which does good. With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the Nation.

[on journalists]

"....The scoundrel who defamed his contemporaries in this villainous way would crown himself with a halo of heroic probity fashioned of unctuous phraseology and twaddle about his 'duties as a journalist' and other mouldy nonsense of that kind. When these cuttle-fishes gathered together in large shoals at meetings and congresses they would give out a lot of slimy talk about a special kind of "honor" which they called "the professional honor of the journalist." Then the assembled species would bow their respects to one another.

[on the pretentiousness of 'modern art']

"These [rogues] had a very simple way of presenting their own effusions as works of the highest quality. They offered their incomprehensible and manifestly crazy creations to their amazed contemporaries as what they called 'an inner experience'. Thus they forestalled all adverse criticism at very little cost indeed. Of course nobody ever doubted that there could have been inner experiences like that, but some doubt ought to have arisen as to whether or not there was any justification for exposing these hallucinations of psychopaths or criminals to the sane portion of society. The works produced by a Moritz von Schwind or a Bocklin were also externalizations of an inner experience, but these were inner experiences of divinely gifted artists and not of talentless buffoons."

War Without End

That's their on-going aim. Perhaps you may have noticed! In fact you surely cannot have failed to notice! There's nothing they hate more than seeing neighbor living peaceably with neighbor. Most folk think war is all about profits for the Military-Industrial-Complex, but think again. War - endless war - is nothing short of a religion for these Evil people. Those at the top in the White House in particular. They thrive on seeing everyone constantly at one another's throats. They set about instigating ill-feeling where none existed before. And where it did previously exist, it's further inflamed. It's in their nature; they are Evil. For example, they may purport to be southerners - and then they'll insult and rile the northerners. And vice-versa. Then some other time they'll pretend to be English or Australian or German or French and use cloned passports to murder a Hammas official in Dubai, so the English or the Australians or the Germans or the French get the blame for it. It's a neat way of expanding the war against their enemies whilst gutlessly covering their own cowardly asses. This kind of thing has been going on for years. There's never an end to it. They even betrayed the US as well with the infamous HMS Liberty attack. Yet, on those odd occasions when the truth does come out, a massive damage limitation exercise begins and you will rarely hear another word said on the matter. So far as the mainstream Jewsmedia is concerned, these incidents may never even have happened at all, for all the exposure they're given in their press and broadcast outlets. It is clearly a criminal conspiracy within the bastard class of sickos and perverts we commonly mislabel as the 'Elites.'

They will move to ensure that any moves towards reconciliation between old enemies are nipped in the bud. There must ALWAYS be tension abroad in this world. They will ensure that there will always be the contingency of flash points around the globe. There must always be boogymen for us to focus our fear and hatred against. For example, Iran does a surprise deal with Turkey and Brasil over its nuclear material. The deal is broadly welcomed by the "international community" - whatever the hell that is. But the US sits on its hands for a few days whilst the Jews think up our public reaction for us. Eventually, for entirely false and spurious reasons, Washington's increasingly haggard-looking bull-dike Kike-lover announces to an incredulous world that America will press ahead even more forcefully with sanctions against Iran, notwithstanding the latter's compliance with international law. Israel has spoken so it's back to square one for relations between the US and Iran. THESE HATEFUL PEOPLE DO NOT WANT PEACE. They only live for war and spend most of their time dreaming up ways to stir up further costly and pointless conflicts world-wide. Is THAT what we put them in government for? Is THAT what YOU voted for? Probably not - and neither did I.

Those tax dollars of ours that Big Government incinerates on the other side of the world would be a hell of a lot better spent by YOU and ME on our struggling families' needs.

Starving our Children

In a very well-written essay of late February 2010 penned by David DeGraw of Amped Status Report entitled The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America, the author states the following:-

"...As a record number of US citizens are struggling to get by, many of the largest corporations are experiencing record breaking profits, and CEOs are receiving record breaking bonuses. How could this be happening; how did we get to this point?

"The Economic Elite have escalated their attack on US workers over the past few years; however, this attack began to build intensity in the 1970s. In 1970, CEOs made $25 for every dollar the average American worker made. Due to technological advancements, production and profit levels exploded from 1970-2000. With the lion's share of increased profits going to the CEOs, this pay ratio dramatically rose to $90 for CEOs to $1 for the average worker.

"As ridiculous as that seems, an in-depth study in 2004 on the explosion of CEO pay revealed that, including stock options and other benefits, CEO pay was more accurately $500 to $1. Paul Bucheit, from DePaul University, revealed, 'From 1980-2006 the richest 1% of America tripled their after-tax percentage of our nation's total income, while the bottom 90% have seen their share drop over 20%.'

"Robert Freeman added, 'Between 2002 and 2006 it was even worse: an astounding three-quarters of all the economy's growth was captured by the top 1%.'"

The LLoyd Blankfeins of this world have done extraordinarily well, notwithstanding the financial crisis that they got us into. It hasn't affected their bonus levels at all. Blankfein (Goldman-Sachs's CEO) pocketed not far short of $50m in bonuses last month for the year ending April 2010. He was paid similar sums in the years beforehand, too, whilst the financial storm he helped to create was raging outside his palatial Wall Street offices. And he and his cronies get more and more brazen about it, too. There's no longer any attempt to conceal, divert or delay these payments.

We can now see clearly that these huge sums of money are coming directly out of our hard-earned paychecks and going directly into the capacious coffers of Jewish merchant/investment banks. It's as if we are coming to the point were we deem it normal to pay vast bonuses to economic vandals who bring down entire economies. One can only assume from this that our government is pleased with the work the Wall Street bankers have carried out. Strange old world out there, isn't it? Not so much like "rewards for failure" as it was quickly dubbed by the MSM; more like "rewards for successfully wrecking the world economy."

Of course, the die-hard free-marketeers (who are almost all Jews or in the thrall of the Jews) will say, "there's nothing wrong with this trend. This is the free market at work and it's the free market that made America great in the first place and the free market that will make it great again." But this is a flawed argument. It is easy to see that if this is taken to its logical extreme, then the middle classes along with our skilled blue collar workers will be completely wiped out. The Satan-worshipers at the top will not be satisfied with attaining extreme wealth alone. Their belief system also requires that ordinary people be made to gratuitously suffer.

Our rulers seem to have adopted a Stalinesque outlook towards the middle classes. They seem to regard them as akin to the Kulaks of 1930s Russia. Stalin detested the Kulaks. They were a little better off than the ordinary base peasants of the country and were able to farm their own small patches of land. This class distinction seems to have sealed their fate for them in Stalin's eyes. Wiping them out in their millions, as he did, didn't by itself suffice, either. It wasn't good enough for them simply to be machine-gunned to death. They had to be systematically starved - entire families and villages. They were forbidden from eating the grain they depended on for subsidence. It was all sequestrated in the name of Communist ideology and shipped off to the cities. The Kulak farmers were left to starve. Even digging up a dead horse to eat its rotting flesh carried the death penalty for a Kulak. By April 1934, over 20 million of them were already dead.

It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate the trend of the last 4 decades. You think the kind of thing that happened in Russia in the 20th century can't happen in today's America? If so you haven't woken up yet. History always repeats itself if its lessons are ignored. Pragmatists survive; dreamers don't. The worst attitude to adopt is an unquestioning faith in elected government. The people at the top in public life are closely allied with Satanism. They are occultists. Some of them have even admitted it. They openly display esoteric symbolism affirming their Luciferin devotion. Just take a look at a dollar bill for a start, if you haven't already.

These craven, self-serving plutocrats are unquestionably malignant. They are demonstrably evil. They are corporate globalists with no sense of patriotism, honor, cultural heritage, nor public duty. The sooner the broad mass of people wake up to this malignant form of occult-based parasitism that is sucking the very life blood out of a once-great nation, the better. The future that awaits us, if we continue to bury our heads in the sand as we have done thus far, will be very bleak indeed.

Problem - Reaction - Solution: an age-old con re-examined

1. The ruling power, in its own interests, contrives a phony event to provoke public outrage against some innocent third party or thing.

2. The public, duly outraged, demands 'something' be done.

3. The ruling power, in response, provides a 'solution' to the problem it had itself

originally created.

Let's expand a bit. I know others have examined this concept before (most recently of note, David Icke, although he was not the first but all credit to you nonetheless, Mr. Icke). In any event, it is very worthy of further examination in the light of the times we currently live in.

We are witnessing the unfolding of an extraordinary age where our fundamental freedoms and rights are under serious and sustained attack by those who purport to rule us by our consent. The country where this disturbing state of affairs is most obviously the case, and has been for a generation now, is the UK. Rights and freedoms have been removed at a rate not seen there for nearly 800 years, and on the flimsy pretext of preventing possible 'terrorist attacks.' But the trend is far from confined to one country and we have seen similar attacks on our rights here in the US and further afield as well.

The problem-reaction-solution hypothesis requires a trigger event. In the US, the most prominent for many decades was the 9/11 attacks in New York (which of course we now know were carried out by Israel with George Bush's blessing). There have been other, less high-profile attempts since then, with various individuals trying to blow up aircraft with bombs concealed in their clothing (most notably the "underpants bomber" who was kindly escorted on board a US flight by none other than the US intelligence services, incredibly).

This is the way the classical model for this scam has worked in the past. Some kind of outrage takes place; the people demand action; the government complies, but the measures have "unintended negative consequences" for our personal freedoms (unintended, yeah, right). But recently, the steps involved have become a little flaky. Whilst we have seen no end to the pressure to curtail our rights and attack our freedoms (Stage 3 of the process) there has been a distinct lack of drive for such measures to come about from stages 1 and 2.

It is as if our governments were giving up on trying to fool us that it is all about 'protecting us' from some external threat. After all, since the truth about 9/11 broke free of the MSM pen, there have scarcely been massed columns of outraged citizens marching down Pennsylvania Avenue demanding more of their liberties be sacrificed, have there? Each new phony, government-orchestrated "terror" alarm is met by increasing levels of scepticism if not outright disbelief by an increasingly better-informed public.

More and more, in the age of the Internet and the ubiquitous presence of 'citizen journalists' with their vast numbers of cell phones and camcorders, Stage 1 operations appear to have been abandoned as now too risky for governments and their lackeys to carry out. Stage 2 (public outrage) which was increasingly failing to materialize anyway due to public suspicion, consequently arises no longer at all.

But hey-ho! There's nevertheless the Stage 3 'solution' to these non-existent threats: take the citizens' ancient, hard-fought rights away regardless, on the basis that there's some vague and unspecified but nonetheless serious existential threat to public safety that we cannot be told about in detail owing to, ahem, 'security considerations.'

We really must be NUTS to suffer this despicable situation to continue. As Huxley warned us more than five decades ago, the only REAL threat to peace and our traditional way of life is generated by our very own governments. And boy, they are surely demonstrating this uncomfortable little fact more and more with every year that passes.

Destroying society through the family

This blogger, like many of you, has been confounded and dismayed by the astonishing number of marriage, family and just general relationship breakdowns that occur nowadays. Confounded, that is, until a little Judao-sceptic thinking shed light on this seemingly inexorable plague on our society. The problem in my view lies with the mainstream media and it is our newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations that primarily bear responsibility for this dismal situation. And of course we all know exactly which breed of reptile owns the media...

Broadly speaking, there are two ways to screw up a newly-married couple's future happiness. The first way is the most obvious: you can simply pour poison on them. By this method you can openly assert in strident tones that the marriage is doomed to fail and its participants will never, ever, find happiness. This method may well prove effective. However, sometimes the curser may discover that instead of serving its intended purpose, it galvanizes the participants of the marriage into working harder to ensure that the relationship succeeds, simply in order to prove the curser wrong and out of spite against he or she if you will.

The second of the aforementioned methods, however, is far more deadly, yet it never reflects badly and never embarrasses the ill-wisher. Indeed, the ill-wisher is not only regarded as entirely blameless, but also as a good-hearted soul deserving of sincere thanks!

How can this be? Simply, my friends, via the diametrically-opposite technique. I postulate here that all that is necessary is for the ill-wisher to assure the participants in the relationship that life for them will be a breeze and that they have every right to expect to live happily ever after and enjoy every single moment together. 'All your dreams will come true'...'It's a match made in heaven'....'Every second you spend together should be precious.' And so on.. And so on... And so on.... This pernicious yet invisible form of curse often starts from Day One: the bride must have the "perfect wedding" where she feels she's the most special girl in the world for the day and that it's chocolates, wine and roses ever after. Everything must be the best on the wedding day; everything shiny and perfect; nothing must go wrong.

The spectacular success of this deeply devious, underhanded approach can be seen in the Sunday papers every weekend where celebrity dream-couples' broken romances litter the tabloids over multiple consecutive pages. These A-listers are the first-line victims of this hex, because they live in a bubble where every OTHER aspect of their lives can be readily controlled by their wealth and/or connections. Not so, however, when it comes to their intimate, personal relationships! The Beatles sang that money can't by love and our 'Hollywood royalty' soon find out there's a good deal else it can't buy within relationships, either.

But the foregoing is equally applicable to ordinary folks. Advice columns preach to readers that if they're not enjoying *great, mind-blowing sex* at least 5 times a day, then there's something wrong with their relationship. Plus of course, not only does the wife have to be a great cook in the kitchen, and great housewife with the duster and Hoover, but a tigress in the sack and a successful businesswoman to boot. And the man - he has to be masterful and strong and a successful breadwinner - but he must also have a sensitive side as well. He must be a great dad, a great provider, a great listener, a best friend, a soul name it. So much is expected of both parties, who are each encouraged to believe they can expect so much of each other in return! When such mantras as these are repeatedly broadcast from every Jewish media orifice in existence, who could ever deny their self-evident truth?

Giving newly married couples the idea that married life is simply heaven and should constantly be like living in a wonderful dream is nothing less than a recipe for shattering disappointments and misery and is a guaranteed way to break up the best of matches in very short order. So what does our woeful wife do, when she discovers further down the line that marriage isn't quite what it was cracked up to be? In a mix of despair and disillusionment she writes to a newspaper column "agony aunt" or asks some "guru" on a radio show phone-in. Can you guess the likely ethnicity of the 'advisor'? Or the likely advice she'll get? "Leave him, he obviously doesn't love you." Bet your bottom dollar that'll be what it boils down to! And if there are children involved, so much the better as far as the Jews are concerned. They HATE us and the "family" is just another obstacle to the change they want to see come about: BIG change in the shape of the ruination of decent society and them reigning over the ensuing chaos ever-after.